WASHINGTON - s4story -- In the most recent decision holding that judges can boycott law schools by refusing to hire their students as law clerks because of antisemitism on the campus after Hamas' attack on Israel, the Seventh Circuit Judicial Council just dismissed a complaint against one of thirteen judges who joined the boycott of Columbia Law School.

Its decision said very clearly that "a judge may refuse to hire law clerks from a law school or university that has, in the judge's view, failed to foster important aspects of higher education like civility in discourse, respect for freedom of speech, and viewpoint nondiscrimination. Accordingly, the law-clerk hiring boycott is neither inconsistent with the integrity of the judicial office nor likely to diminish public confidence in the judiciary."

Similar complaints were filed against judges in the Fifth Circuit, Eleventh Circuit, and the Court of Federal Claims, but all were dismissed on similar grounds, notes public interest law professor John Banzhaf.

More on S For Story

• Instant IP Teams: Bringing Enterprise-Grade Collaboration to IP Protection at the Speed of Thought
• Delta Authors on Tour In the Eastern Region Heads to Newark Public Library on April 18, 2026
• UK Financial Ltd Confirms CATEX Exchange Integration of SMPRA and LTNS 1 Ahead of Compliance-Based Trading Activation
• Ashikaga Flower Park's "Great Wisteria Festival 2026"
• Architect of Neurodiversity Will Lead the First U.S. Team of Autistic Children to the "Genius Cup" in Hiroshima, Japan, in 2027

For example, the Fifth Circuit ruled as follows:

"a refusal to hire a law clerk from a particular university whose students reportedly engaged in unlawful activity or violent acts, without more is not evidence that the judge cannot remain impartial towards attorneys or parties who graduated from that university.

Banzhaf may have helped trigger the trend when somewhat earlier he threatened to punish students at Stanford Law School who, in violation of the school's free speech rules, shouted down and prevented a speech by a federal judge who was an invited speaker.

As a result, several judges announced that they would refuse to hire graduates from law schools which did not respect and enforces guarantees of free speech and respect for the views of others.
This Law Professor Took on Nixon and Trump. Now He's Facing Off Against Stanford Law School Students (https://freebeacon.com/campus/this-law-professor-took-on-nixon-and-trump-now-hes-facing-off-against-stanford-law-school-students/)

More on S For Story

• Deborah E. Jones Introduces Emotional Sovereignty, a Powerful New Book on Emotional Mastery, Resilience, and Intentional Living
• "memoirs Of The End," A New Novel Depicting Life After The Ai Singularity
• New Research Identifies "The Busy Effect": 89% of Americans Want a Laid-Back Vacation — Only 15% Actually Achieve It
• Alchemy 43 Appoints Shane Smith as CEO to Drive Operational Performance and Scalable Growth
• New from Regal House Publishing, Pinkie's Turnabout, a girl fights to adopt a cat to save her

"The permissiveness prompted a heated debate about how best to discipline law schools that won't discipline their own students, and led 14 federal judges, including James Ho and Elizabeth Branch, to announce that they would no longer hire clerks from Yale Law." [emphasis added]

Now that the Trump administration is cracking down on schools which allegedly permitted or even encouraged criminal protests - including assaults on other students, defacement of property, and the illegal occupation of campus buildings - Banzhaf hopes that even more judges will be encouraged and emboldened to consider a law school's "respect for freedom of speech" and similar conduct in awarding these very prestigious and highly sought after clerkship positions.

http://banzhaf.net/   jbanzhaf3ATgmail.com   @profbanzhaf